In 1960 ... and then, in the Year 2000 ... the reasonable person assumed that the Third Secret of Fatima would prophecy something far worse than did the Second Secret. Now, the Second Secret involved mass-scale destruction and the dehumanizing of humanity. So, the Third Secret would logically be a prophecy of something far far worse than a pope getting shot, and then recovering, followed by him living for another 25 years.
In 1960, when the Vatican hired an agency to send forth a press release on the Third Secret of Fatima, the statement admitted that "words spoken by Our Lady" to the three Fatima visionaries existed as a part of the Third Secret. Therefore, Cardinals Sodano, Bertone, and Ratzinger were the unconscionable deceivers in the June 2000 press release on the subject.
Moreover, there were individuals who did read the Third Secret and who gave general comments about its contents. One is that it has nothing to do with nuclear disaster, as was thought during the height of the Cold War in 1960.
Also keep in mind that Pope Benedict XVI expressly said that no one is bound to believe in the June 2000 interpretation of the Third Secret. He also said that we would be deluding ourselves to think that the message of Fatima is behind us.
Now for the Third Secret
The Third Secret of Fatima is a complete indictient against the Vatican, warning the Faithful that wolves in shepherd's clothing would take control of it. Our Lady was warning the flock of the evil which was destined to exude from the Vatican, if her requests were ignored. This evil has been evidenced repeatedly in the late 20th and early 21st Century.
Examples of Vatican corruption are 1} the Maciel cover-up. He was the most notorious molester of all-time and was highly respected by a John Paul II who did know about the sex abuse scandal in the present tense. 2} the recent catering to the clerics proven to be corrupt as:
3} the Vatican Bank scandal which resulted in the Vatican being ordered to pay $224 nillion to creditors and which also resulted in the arrest of Monsignor Nunzio Scarano for alescing from the bank the equivalent of $600,000, and which additionally resulted in the arrest of Monsignor Silverio Sica, for smuggling to Italy Euros dollars (unaccounted currency) from Switzerland. 4} and of course, the Vatileaks saga where it was conjectured that certain clergyman used butler Paolo Gabrielle as the fall guy, in seeking to let the public know that the Ratzinger Papacy was a tenure of corruption, 5} The Sexual Abuse Scandal, etc.
The corruption which was guaranteed to unfold from the Vatican why the reason why Our Lady expressly ordered Sister Lucia to state that the sealed secret was not to be opened until the arrival of 1960, and that it would be opened by either the cardinal patriarch of Lisbon or the bishop of Leiria. Fatima, incidentally, is under the jurisdiction of the Bishop of Leiria.
 |
| You can prioritize the Eternal God or Mammon, but not both. When mammon is the priority, the church gets distorted. |
Now, the Third Secret is preceded by the phrase, "In Portugal, the doctrine of the Faith will always be perserved." Thus, the Third Secret was to be opened by the standard bearers ... by the keepers of the gate ... by those guaranteed to keep the doctrine of the Apostles in tact. One of the two previously mentioned bishops were the ones who should have read the secret in 1960.
The Vatican refrained from revealing the verbal part of the Third Secret, because it is so damning to the Vatican. After all, when you wear the shoes of the Galilean fisherman, you do not have to live in wall to wall luxury.
In 1960, when Pope John XXIII, said that the Third Secret was not for his papacy, he implied that the Queen of Heaven was an incompetent moron who didn't know what she was saying when she expressly ordered that the Third Secret be opened in 1960. He claimed to know more than she did.
Of course, Vatican II was in its beginning stage at the time, and it was guaranteed to corrupt the Faith and cause a great number of people to stop going to Sunday Mass and following standard moral precepts.
1960 was the beginning of upheaval. It was quite a coincidence that the Third Secret was to be opened at that time. But, there is no such thing as coincidences. Our Lady knew what was right. John XXIII
did not. If he simply would have done the consecration, he could have spared millions. Many wars would have been avoided. Thus, the obese John XXIII caused a lot of havoc by his disrespect.
 |
| Vatican II reforms were as abstract as modern act. |
Now, the late Malachi Martin was a periti (assistant) at the second Vatican Council, for Cardinal Augustin Bea. Under an oath of confidentiality, he read the secret. Years later, he said the following:
- Russia and the Ukraine are mentioned in the Third Secret, but NOT the United States.
- It deals with the Great Apostasy mentioned in Paul's second letter to the Thessalonians, and it will stat at the top of the church's hierarchy. In as much, 1/3 of the hierarchy will apostatize.
-The Third Secret prophesied "several" chastisements, and no one on Earth will be immune, geographically speaking --- according to Martin.
In fact, during a radio show, a person read what was purported to be a line from the Third Secret, confided to someone by a Jesuit priest. It dealt with Satan being in control of one of the popes. After having heard the sentence, Malachi said that the person who wrote that line either read the secret or was
told the secret. Thus, the Third Secret involves a Satanic Puppet Pope and apostasy, as well as Russia and the Ukraine.
All in all, the purpose for the prophesied chastisements is to cleanse mankind of its modernized habit of evil. It will be a devastating cleansing process.
The valid consecration of Russia can prevent it. Consecrating the world negates the point of consecration. To consecrate is to set aside part of a whole, for the sake of the whole. Russia has to be consecrated by name by all of the available bishops. The result promised is the conversion of Russia from sin and a period of World Peace. What do today's bishops have against World Peace?
